The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe

The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe

By Elizabeth A. R. Brown

The American Historical Review, Vol. 79, No. 4 (1974)

Introduction: At a recent conference Thomas N. Bisson introduced his paper “Institutional Structures of the Medieval Peace” by cautioning his audience that in his discussion of peace movements, peace associations, and peace institutions in southern France and Spain he would not attempt to relate his findings to “feudalism.” His approach was descriptive – and thoroughly enlightening – and no further reference to any ism occurred until the question period. Then, bestowing the double-edged praise that is his hallmark, Professor John F. Benton asked how historians could have managed to overlook for so long such abundant evidence that would necessitate the revision of numerous lectures on medieval society. Responding to this remark, Professor Bisson again alluded to the eventual necessity of evaluating his conclusions with reference to the general topic of feudalism, but time prevented him from elaborating. It occurred to me as this interchange was taking place that the failure of historians to take account of the data used by Bisson may well have resulted from their concentration on feudalism – as model or Ideal Type – and their consequent tendency. to disregard or dismiss documents not easily assimilable into that frame of reference.

Whatever their relevance to the subject of Professor Bisson’s paper, feelings of uneasiness concerning the term “feudalism” are not uniquely mine. Historians have for years harbored doubts about the term “feudalism” and the phrase “feudal system,” which has often been used as a synonym for it. One of the first, and certainly one of the wittiest and most eloquent, to comment on the problem was Frederic William Maitland. In lectures on English constitutional history prepared in 1887 and 1888 he wrote:

Now were an examiner to ask who introduced the feudal system into England? one very good answer, if properly explained, would be Henry Spelman, and if there followed the question, what was the feudal system? a good answer to that would be, an early essay in comparative jurisprudence …. If my examiner went on with his questions and asked me, when did the feudal system attain its most perfect development? I should answer, about the middle of the last century.

Watch the video: Feudalism. Wikipedia audio article (August 2022).